
Here is a sample of Finnish poet Elmer Diktonius(1896-1961). He was part Finland´s Swedish speaking minority. Well, Swedish is our second official language but still its minority.
One of Diktonius´s most interesting books is his first. It is called Min dikt(1921); my poetry, written when he was only 25. It´s an collection of aforisms and short verses, mostly about art which is considered to by crucial organ of life by Elmer Diktonius.
Min dikt, Runoni in Finnish, is not very famous book among fins. I don’t know many people who have read it. It was written shortly after civil war which was won by whites. This time is kind of a blurry in Finnish history and not much mentioned. Or that’s how I feel about it. It is called a war of brother against brother. Elmer Diktonius was more to the red side and like mentioned Swedish speaking and writing. So he was definitely in marginal. Min dikt is tough and demanding words about how art should and could be. In 1920´s
But I love Diktonius´s thoughts. They are like fists. As an exercise I try to translate randomly opened page in to English. This can also be taken as a Finnish language lesson!
Page 82 from Elmer Diktonius: Runoni, Translated from Swedish by Arvo Turtiainen and to English by yours truly
Kukaan ei pysty luomaan
uudestiluominen on sitä mitä me teemme.
Ei ole olemassa mitään mitä ei voida lyödä maahan
ei mitään mitä ei voi uudesti luoda – se on suurta
Onko taiteilijan odotettava aikaansa?
Eikö ole oikeampaa sanoa että hänen on odotettava oman
aikansa ihmisiä.
Taiteilijat, jotka elävät niin pitkällä aikaansa edellä
etteivät kuule läheistensä ja miljoonien muiden
ihmisolentojen huutoa tästä helvetistä, eivät ole
ansainneet elämäänsä.
/
Nobody can create.
Re-creation is what we do.
There is nothing that cannot be struck down
there is nothing that cannot be re-created – That is great.
Must artist wait for his time?
Isn´t it more right to put it this way, that he has to wait for
people of his time.
Artists, who live so far ahead from their time
that they cannot hear the scream of their closest ones and of millions of other
human beings from this hell,
have not deserved their lives
Page 83
Uusi taideteoksessa ei estä sen ymmärtämistä vaan vanha
ihmisissä.
Ostamme taidetta elämällä niin että ymmärrämme sitä
Mutta onhan persoonallisuuksia joita on kutsuttava
suuriksi vaikka heiltä puuttuukin taiteen taju.
On toki.
Samaten kuin suurmiehiä jotka ovat mykkiä, sokeita tai
kuuroja.
Haava joka kirveltää:
että useimmat radikaaleista taiteilijoista ovat
konservatiiveja suhteessa ajan suuriin kysymyksiin;
että useimmat ajan suurissa kysymyksissä radikaalit
ovat konservatiiveja suhteessa taiteeseen.
/
New in artwork does not prevent its understanding but the old in
people.
We buy art by living so that we understand it.
But there are personalities who are to be called
great even if they lack the sense of art.
Yes, indeed there is.
In the same sense there are great men who are mute, blind or
deaf.
The wound that smarts:
that most of the radical artists are
conservatives in relation to the big questions of our times;
that most of those who are radical to big questions of our times
are conservatives in relation to art.
No comments:
Post a Comment